Skip to content

Small molecules · Process map

Flow synthesis

This reference process map organizes small-molecule flow synthesis and analysis in the order of continuous reaction, in-line analysis and workup. The optimal method depends on the reaction format, the residence time and how well the PAT (process analytical technology) is built out, so each step also lists alternative and complementary methods.

19 steps in 5 phases · the reference method for each step, the equipment and makers behind it, and the alternatives used in practice

Editor's note. The biggest reason flow is chosen is that it lets you run hazardous reactions safely. Chemistries such as hydrogenation, nitration and low-temperature diazotization carry the risks of thermal runaway and large hold-up in batch. In flow, a small inventory and high heat-transfer and heat-removal capacity bring them into continuous steady-state operation. Including continuous crystallization (MSMPR), the whole picture looks attractive, but the first stumbling block in technology transfer is usually solids. Precipitation and slurry transport clog the piping and stop the entire line. Whether a flow process succeeds is decided less by how impressive the reaction is than by solids handling and the character of the residence time distribution (RTD). Talking about scale as a simple time conversion of batch results overlooks that wall.

Used to makeSmall-molecule payloads (cytotoxic drugs) loaded onto ADCs, Small-molecule payloads conjugated to cell-free ADCs

This map assumes Chemocatalytic flow (metal catalysis, catalytic hydrogenation). Steps marked ◇ change with Biocatalytic flow (immobilized enzyme, packed bed). This is a route that switches the core asymmetric/reduction step from metal catalysis or catalytic hydrogenation to an immobilized-enzyme packed bed. The change from Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation to the transaminase process for sitagliptin is a representative manufacturing fork of this kind, replacing high-pressure hydrogenation, catalyst metals and chiral resolution all at once.

At a glance

  1. Synthesis and reaction
    1. 01 Reactor selection and running the continuous reaction (main chemical transformation; main reaction, continuous-flow reaction) ◇
    2. 02 Continuous processing of hazardous and gas-liquid reactions (hydrogenation, oxidation, halogenation, photoreactions; continuous hydrogenation, gas-liquid reactions)
    3. 03 In-line monitoring of reaction progress and conversion (PAT: FTIR/Raman; in-line PAT, reaction monitoring)
    4. 04 Characterization of residence time distribution (RTD) and mixing performance (residence time distribution / RTD evaluation)
  2. Workup and separation
    1. 05 Continuous quench and neutralization by in-line addition of a quench solution: an acid, base or nucleophile is merged into the reaction stream in metered amounts to deactivate residual reagents and bring the pH to the conditions for the downstream extraction (in-line quench and neutralization)
    2. 06 Continuous liquid-liquid extraction and phase separation (in-line washing and quench; continuous liquid-liquid extraction, phase separation) ◇
    3. 07 Continuous removal of metal catalysts (Pd, etc.) with scavenger-packed cartridges: the stream is passed through a fixed bed packed with functionalized silica/scavenger resin to reduce residual transition metals to the ICH Q3D limits (residual metal scavenging)
    4. 08 Solvent exchange, concentration and continuous distillation (solvent control before crystallization; solvent exchange, concentration)
  3. Workup and crystallization
    1. 09 Isolation by continuous crystallization and control of crystal form and particle size (continuous crystallization)
  4. Workup and isolation
    1. 10 Continuous filtration, washing and drying (solid-liquid separation and desolvation of wet crystals; solid-liquid separation, drying/isolation)
  5. Quality attributes and analytics
    1. 11 Structure confirmation (identification)
    2. 12 Quantitation of content (assay) and related substances (organic impurities) (assay and related substances test) ◇
    3. 13 Confirmation of optical purity and enantiomeric excess: unwanted enantiomers are separated and quantitated by chiral stationary phase HPLC, and enantiomeric purity (ee) is controlled within the specification (chiral separation, optical purity test)
    4. 14 Trace control of mutagenic (genotoxic) impurities and nitrosamines (mutagenic impurity and nitrosamine control)
    5. 15 Quantitation of residual solvents (ICH Q3C / USP <467>) (residual solvents test)
    6. 16 Identification of solid form (polymorphs, crystallinity) (polymorph and solid form identification)
    7. 17 Evaluation of particle size distribution (PSD) and particle morphology (particle size distribution, PSD evaluation) ◇
    8. 18 Control of inorganic impurities (elemental impurities, residual metal catalysts) (elemental impurity analysis)
    9. 19 Confirmation of water content, loss on drying and content uniformity (water content / loss on drying test)

Phase 1Synthesis and reaction

01

Reactor selection and running the continuous reaction (main chemical transformation; main reaction, continuous-flow reaction)

A step that improves mixing and heat transfer in a narrow channel, suppressing temperature runaway in exothermic and fast reactions while carrying lab conditions straight over to production scale.

Standard method
Micro/mesoscale continuous-flow reaction (liquid-liquid reaction in a plate-type flow reactor)
Reagents and materials
Bulk organic solvents

Why it is the standard. Corning AFR is said to give about 100 times the mixing and about 1,000 times the heat transfer of batch, and glass/SiC modules allow continuous processing from lab to industrial scale with the same channel design, so it is widely adopted as a representative platform for flow chemistry in pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals. Pharmaceutical companies such as Angelini Pharma have installed the G4. Sources: corning.com Advanced-Flow Reactors, OPRD acs.oprd.9b00524 (review of flow chemistry in pharmaceutical manufacturing)

Check also. The first stumbling block in moving to flow is usually solids. If crystals or slurry precipitate during the reaction, the narrow channels clog and the entire line stops. For systems that form solids, stirred (CSTR) or oscillatory baffled types are sometimes better suited than plate types; the equipment format is chosen by solids handling rather than by how impressive the reaction is.

With Biocatalytic flow (immobilized enzyme, packed bed)

  • Catalytic hydrogenation itself is replaced by enzymatic reduction/amination, so H2 gas and metal catalysts are no longer needed
  • Method: Trickle-bed catalytic hydrogenation is eliminated and replaced by continuous enzymatic reduction or reductive amination with an immobilized reductase/transaminase
  • Equipment: No hydrogen gas or packed-bed hydrogenation reactor is needed. An enzyme PBR and a cofactor regeneration loop take their place
  • Reagents: H2 gas, Pd/C, Rh-Josiphos, etc. are not used. They are replaced by co-substrates for cofactor regeneration (glucose, formate/formate dehydrogenase, etc.)
  • Check also: High-pressure hydrogen equipment and metal catalyst cost disappear, but the cost of the cofactor regeneration system and enzyme stability become the bottleneck
About this step and the alternatives

This is the heart of the process, where the main reaction takes place. Feedstocks are fed at a constant rate into a narrow channel, and the chemical transformation proceeds continuously as they flow. The reaction is completed in the flow, not in a vessel.

The key is the narrowness of the channel. The narrower it is, the more instantly heat and mixing are transferred, so even exothermic or fast reactions can be controlled without temperature swings or side reactions.

To increase output, you run longer rather than build a bigger vessel. That is why conditions optimized in the lab can be carried straight over to large-scale production, which is the greatest practical advantage on the shop floor.

Feedstocks are pumped at a constant rate and react continuously in a narrow channel. The narrower the channel, the more efficiently heat and mixing are transferred, so temperature swings are kept down even for exothermic or fast reactions. Scale is gained not by building a bigger vessel as in batch but by running longer, so conditions optimized in the lab transfer readily to large-scale production.

Alternatives in practice

  • Coil/tube-type flow reaction (R&D to kilo lab) · Vapourtec R-Series (R2 + R4, PFA/SS coil reactors) / Uniqsis FlowSyn (glass chip + coil) — Suited to small-scale, high-variety screening. Channel volume is variable, so residence time can be set flexibly
  • CSTR cascade / continuous oscillatory baffled reactor (COBR) · AM Technology Coflore ACR (agitated cell reactor) / NiTech DN15 continuous oscillatory baffled reactor (COBR) — Strong with solid slurries, long residence times and slow reactions. An alternative for systems where plate-type reactors clog
  • Batch reaction (conventional method, control) · Mettler Toledo OptiMax 1001 / EasyMax 102 synthesis workstation — For comparison controls and initial condition screening. Used to check exotherm and scale constraints
02

Continuous processing of hazardous and gas-liquid reactions (hydrogenation, oxidation, halogenation, photoreactions; continuous hydrogenation, gas-liquid reactions)

Minimizes the in-system inventory of hazardous reactions such as hydrogenation and fixes the pyrophoric catalyst in a packed bed, allowing safe high-temperature, high-pressure operation.

Standard method
Continuous packed-bed (trickle-bed) hydrogenation
Equipment
Continuous flow hydrogenation
Reagents and materials
Flow hydrogenation catalyst cartridge

Why it is the standard. About 25% of marketed drugs and clinical candidates are said to include at least 1 hydrogenation step, and flow hydrogenation offers safety and reproducibility advantages: containment of the pyrophoric catalyst, no catalyst filtration and tight control of parameters. The H-Cube was the first commercial flow hydrogenation unit. Sources: PMC3170201 (evaluation of a packed-bed flow hydrogenator), ResearchGate Fixed Bed Continuous Hydrogenations in Trickle Flow Mode

Check also. A catalyst fixed in a packed bed loses activity with use, and conversion falls if the flow becomes uneven (channeling). Moving from in situ hydrogen generation in the lab to production-scale gas supply changes the gas-liquid contact conditions, so catalyst life and mass transfer are reconfirmed on the actual equipment at scale-up.

About this step and the alternatives

A step that puts hazardous reactions with explosive or toxic reagents, such as hydrogenation and oxidation, into flow. Charging everything at once in batch lets hazardous material accumulate, and flow avoids that.

At the moment of reaction, the amount of hazardous material in the system is very small. The risk in case of an incident is therefore small, and aggressive conditions such as high temperature and pressure can be approached safely.

The catalyst is fixed in a packed bed (trickle bed). The readily ignitable palladium catalyst does not have to be handled directly, and catalyst filtration after the reaction is also unnecessary, which is where it pays off in practice.

Reactions that use hydrogen gas or toxic or explosive reagents build up a dangerous quantity when charged all at once in batch. In flow, the amount of hazardous material in the system at any moment of reaction is very small, so you can safely push to high temperature and pressure. If the catalyst is fixed in a packed bed, you avoid handling the readily ignitable palladium catalyst, and no filtration step is needed.

Alternatives in practice

  • Continuous photoredox / photohalogenation · Corning Advanced-Flow G1 Photo Reactor / Vapourtec UV-150 photochemical reactor (E-Series) — For transformations that are difficult thermally, such as radical generation and photoredox. No gas is needed, which reduces hazard
  • Gas-liquid segmented (Taylor) flow oxidation / carbonylation · Vapourtec gas supply module (gas/liquid reactor) + mass flow controller (Bronkhorst EL-FLOW Select) — Gaseous reagents such as O2, CO and ethylene react efficiently in slug flow with a large specific surface area
  • Membrane (tube-in-tube) gas-liquid contacting reaction · Teflon AF-2400 tube-in-tube reactor (Uniqsis Gas Addition module, etc.) — Gas is dissolved in a controlled amount through the membrane. Supplies H2/CO2/O2 uniformly without headspace
03

In-line monitoring of reaction progress and conversion (PAT: FTIR/Raman; in-line PAT, reaction monitoring)

A step that monitors conversion by infrared and Raman in the flowing stream and corrects flow rate or temperature the moment they drift, assuring quality during production.

Standard method
Reaction monitoring by in-line FTIR (ATR flow cell)
Equipment
Inline FT-IR / ATR flow reaction monitoring
Makers
Mettler-Toledo
Reagents and materials
None (ATR-FTIR optical measurement). The ATR crystal is diamond (DiComp) / silicon (SiComp). A background solvent spectrum is acquired for calibration.

Why it is the standard. FlowIR/ReactIR are widely used for real-time, nondestructive monitoring of reactions, and in the 5-step continuous synthesis of ciprofloxacin there is a documented case in which intermediate and API concentrations were monitored by PAT using in-line FTIR and Raman. Sources: OPRD acs.oprd.1c00299 (in-line FTIR/Raman in a Mobile CM), RSC D3RE00678F (role of PAT in telescoped continuous flow)

Check also. Following composition in the flowing stream by infrared or Raman becomes quantitative only after a calibration model (chemometrics) has been built from samples of known concentration in advance. The readings drift with temperature, solvent and bubbles, so at key points a sample is drawn off and checked against another method such as HPLC to keep the model valid.

About this step and the alternatives

A monitoring step in which a window is placed in the piping to look at the contents while they flow. Infrared (FTIR) or Raman measures the composition, and how far the reaction has progressed is followed in real time.

The weakness of flow is that it is hard to draw out a sample midway and check it. So the disappearance of the feedstock and the growth of the product are watched continuously, and flow rate or temperature is corrected the moment they drift.

Quality is assured while the product is being made, rather than noticed after a defect has been produced. This is the idea behind PAT (process analytical technology), and it is central to quality assurance in continuous manufacturing.

In flow it is hard to draw out the contents and check them, so a window is placed in the piping and the composition is observed by infrared or Raman while the stream flows. The disappearance of the feedstock and the growth of the product can be followed in real time, so flow rate or temperature can be corrected the moment they drift. This is the core of the PAT approach, which assures quality while the product is being made rather than noticing after a defective product has been made.

Alternatives in practice

  • In-line/on-line UV-Vis spectroscopy · Avantes AvaSpec-ULS2048CL-EVO spectrometer + flow-through cell / Ocean Insight Flame-S + fiber-optic probe — Fast and low-cost for systems with a chromophore. Continuous trend of concentration and conversion
  • On-line HPLC/UHPLC with automated sampling · Agilent 1260 Infinity II Online LC System (with Online Sample Manager) — Quantitation of complex reactions that need separation. Related substances can also be tracked, but time resolution is low
  • Benchtop NMR on-line monitoring · Magritek Spinsolve (60/80 MHz, flow cell / PTFE tubing reaction monitoring kit) / Bruker Fourier 80 — Structure-selective and quantitative. Directly tracks functional group conversion. Not suited to paramagnetic or low-concentration samples
04

Characterization of residence time distribution (RTD) and mixing performance (residence time distribution / RTD evaluation)

A step that quantifies mixing, back-mixing and dead volume by the residence time distribution, providing the basis for scale-up and conversion prediction.

Standard method
Residence time distribution measurement by tracer injection (pulse/step response)
Makers
Knauer, Vapourtec, IDEX
Reagents and materials
Inert tracer: UV-absorbing dye (aqueous methylene blue, etc.) or electrolyte (aqueous KCl). Injected through a metering loop / injection valve (Rheodyne/IDEX MXP series).

Why it is the standard. RTD is a fundamental characteristic that quantifies mixing, back-mixing and dead volume in a continuous reactor, and it is the basis for scale-up, modeling and conversion prediction of flow reactions. Residence time can be calculated linearly from the elapsed collection time, and a longer residence time leads directly to higher conversion (a general principle, treated as standard in flow chemistry reviews).

About this step and the alternatives

An evaluation step that checks how uniformly molecules flow inside the reactor. A tracer such as a dye is injected, and the spread in the time until it appears at the outlet is measured.

Ideally all molecules stay in the reactor for the same length of time. In practice some exit quickly and others lag, and this spread is the residence time distribution (RTD).

When the spread is large, the extent of reaction is not uniform and impurities increase. It is unglamorous but effective basic data that underpins scale-up design and reactor evaluation.

This checks how uniformly material flows through a flow reactor. Ideally every molecule stays in the reactor for the same length of time, but in practice some molecules exit quickly and others lag. When this spread (the residence time distribution) is large, the extent of reaction is not uniform and impurities increase. It is basic data that underpins scale-up and process design.

Alternatives in practice

  • CFD prediction of mixing and RTD · Ansys Fluent / Siemens Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (CFD software) — Channel design and dead-volume assessment before measurement. Complementary to experimental tracers
  • Mixing time assessment by the Villermaux–Dushman method · Iodide-iodate competitive reaction system + UV-Vis (I3⁻ detected at 353 nm, using the Avantes/Ocean Insight spectrometers above) — Quantifies micromixing performance. Assesses molecular-diffusion-level mixing that RTD hardly captures

Phase 2Workup and separation

05

Continuous quench and neutralization by in-line addition of a quench solution: an acid, base or nucleophile is merged into the reaction stream in metered amounts to deactivate residual reagents and bring the pH to the conditions for the downstream extraction (in-line quench and neutralization)

Essential to deactivate residual reagents, prevent over-reaction and set the pH conditions for the downstream extraction

Standard method
Continuous metered merging of quench solution and neutralization with a T-mixer / static mixer (with in-line pH monitoring)
Equipment
Coriolis liquid mass flow controller, Single use static mixer, pH meter, Transfer pump
Makers
Hamilton, Sulzer
Reagents and materials
Neutralization buffer

Why it is the standard. Mass flow control plus a static mixer is the standard configuration in actual processes for metered, immediate mixing in continuous flow, and it allows the pH to be controlled reproducibly.

About this step and the alternatives

A step in which a "stop solution" is merged at the reactor outlet to deactivate the remaining reagents. In continuous flow, over-reaction and decomposition proceed during residence unless the reaction is stopped promptly.

Acid, base, water or the like is fed in metered amounts, fixing the conversion (how far the reaction is allowed to go) on the spot. Think of it as cutting the reaction off exactly where intended.

At the same time the pH is adjusted to create a phase suited to the next liquid-liquid extraction. In-line treatment that stops and neutralizes while monitoring the pH is the key to a smooth downstream step.

In continuous flow, if the reaction is not stopped promptly at the reactor outlet, over-reaction and decomposition proceed during residence. The standard step is to merge a quench solution (acid, base, water, etc.) in-line, fix the conversion, and then create the pH and phase suited to the downstream liquid-liquid extraction.

Alternatives in practice

  • Quench and workup in a CSTR · AM Technology Coflore ACR / stirred tank (Mettler Toledo OptiMax 1001) — For highly exothermic quenches and for neutralizations accompanied by solid precipitation. Residence time is easy to secure
  • Automatic acid/base dosing and merging by in-line pH feedback control · Hamilton Polilyte Plus pH electrode + Coriolis pump linked to a PID controller (Bronkhorst CORI-FILL dosing) — Automatically tracks the target pH. Holds the neutralization point constant even in streams with varying composition
06

Continuous liquid-liquid extraction and phase separation (in-line washing and quench; continuous liquid-liquid extraction, phase separation)

A phase-separation step that uses selective wetting of a membrane and differential pressure to separate even emulsions continuously without settling, washing and quenching in the flowing stream.

Standard method
Membrane-based continuous liquid-liquid separation
Equipment
Membrane-based continuous liquid-liquid separators
Makers
Zaiput, Corning
Reagents and materials
Bulk organic solvents

Why it is the standard. Zaiput's membrane separation combines selective wetting of the membrane with differential pressure control, and can separate even emulsions continuously without waiting for settling. Several large pharmaceutical companies including Eli Lilly have demonstrated in-line phase separation in multistage extraction and scale-up. Sources: zaiput.com, MIT News 2018 (founding of Zaiput; used by 9 large pharmaceutical companies), materials on continuous multistage extraction by Adamo et al.

Check also. In continuous separation that passes only the organic phase through a membrane, the phases do not separate completely and breakthrough occurs if surface-active impurities are present or the membrane becomes wetted by water. Separation can be incomplete for systems that emulsify easily or for two phases with a small density difference, so the water content and carryover of the outlet phases are monitored.

With Biocatalytic flow (immobilized enzyme, packed bed)

  • Removal of catalyst-derived Pd/Rh is in principle unnecessary, and removal of protein/enzyme becomes the issue instead
  • Method: Instead of metal scavenging on thiol-functionalized silica, residual protein, enzyme and cofactor are removed continuously by ultrafiltration (UF) / adsorption
  • Equipment: Metal scavenger cartridges are not needed. Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration modules (tens of kDa cutoff) or similar are used
  • Reagents: Thiol/thiourea-functionalized silica is not used. UF membrane, plus activated carbon if needed
  • Check also: The metal-removal criteria (ICP-MS, below) relax, but host protein, residual enzyme and cofactor degradation products become new removal targets
About this step and the alternatives

A step that washes the post-reaction mixture with water, removes impurities and leftover reagents, and separates the organic and aqueous phases. The aim is to take out cleanly only the organic phase that contains the product.

In batch, you wait for the two phases to separate in a separatory funnel, but in flow you cannot wait. A membrane is therefore used that passes only the organic phase and repels the aqueous phase.

Because the phases are separated instantly in the flowing stream, even mixtures that emulsify and are hard to separate can be processed continuously without stopping. It is an unglamorous linchpin that supports the entrance to continuous purification.

After the reaction, impurities and leftover reagents are removed by washing with water. In batch, you wait for the two phases to separate in a separatory funnel, but in flow you cannot wait. A membrane is therefore used that passes only the organic phase and repels the aqueous phase, separating the phases instantly in the flowing stream. Even mixtures that emulsify and are hard to separate can be processed continuously without stopping.

Alternatives in practice

  • Continuous countercurrent multistage extraction · Karr reciprocating-plate extraction column (Koch Modular) / Rousselet Robatel BXP series centrifugal extractors — For systems with low partition coefficients that need many stages. High throughput but large equipment
  • Gravity-settling continuous decanter · Continuous liquid-liquid settler/decanter (CINC V02 centrifugal separator) — Suited to systems with a large density difference and high flow rates. Avoids the risk of membrane clogging
  • In-line acid/base scavenger / solid-phase extraction · SiliCycle SiliaBond Propylsulfonic Acid / SiliaBond Carbonate packed cartridges — Captures trace basic/acidic impurities. An alternative for emulsified systems where liquid-liquid separation is difficult
07

Continuous removal of metal catalysts (Pd, etc.) with scavenger-packed cartridges: the stream is passed through a fixed bed packed with functionalized silica/scavenger resin to reduce residual transition metals to the ICH Q3D limits (residual metal scavenging)

Essential to reduce catalyst-derived residual Pd, etc. to the ICH Q3D elemental impurity limits

Standard method
Single-pass scavenging through cartridges packed with thiol/thiourea-functionalized silica
Equipment
Single-pass scavenging through SiliCycle SiliaMetS E-PAK packed cartridges (housing for large-scale metal removal). Laboratory scale: SiliaPrep SPE cartridges (Thiol: SPE-R51030B, etc.).
Makers
SiliCycle
Reagents and materials
Metal scavenger

Why it is the standard. There are cases of adoption in actual processes, such as at Pfizer, for Pd removal after Buchwald-Hartwig and Suzuki couplings. It captures Pd more efficiently than activated carbon or polymer-based scavengers and can meet ICH Q3D.

Check also. A fixed bed of metal scavenger has limited capacity, and if the flow continues the bed cannot adsorb everything and metal leaks out (breakthrough). Whether removal has succeeded cannot be judged from the scavenger itself, so downstream ICP-MS (elemental impurity analysis) is always used to confirm that residual metal is within the specification.

About this step and the alternatives

A step that removes metal catalysts such as palladium left over from cross-coupling or hydrogenation within the flow. The product stream is passed through a fixed bed packed with a scavenger.

Residual metal would exceed the API (drug substance) elemental impurity limits (ICH Q3D), so it is always removed. Even trace amounts are toxic and cannot be overlooked.

A cartridge packed with silica that grabs metals with thiol groups and the like is inserted in series in the piping, and a single pass brings the level down to within the specification. This is a labor saving unique to continuous purification.

In metal-catalyzed reactions such as cross-coupling and hydrogenation, residual metal exceeds the API elemental impurity limits (ICH Q3D), so the standard is to pass the product stream through a fixed bed of metal scavenger for continuous removal. In flow, packed cartridges are inserted in series and processed in a single pass.

Alternatives in practice

  • Metal capture on a fixed bed of fibrous scavenger · Johnson Matthey Smopex-234 (thiol fiber) / Smopex-111 fixed bed — High flow rate and low pressure drop, suited to large-volume processing. The fibrous form has short diffusion paths and fast capture
  • Polystyrene-based thiourea / triamine resin cartridges · Biotage MP-TMT (trimercaptotriazine resin) / PhosphonicS Si-Thiol series resins — An alternative for strongly acidic / HF-based systems where silica is unsuitable. Watch for resin swelling
08

Solvent exchange, concentration and continuous distillation (solvent control before crystallization; solvent exchange, concentration)

A step that exchanges and concentrates solvent at low temperature in a short time by thin-film evaporation, preparing the stream for crystallization without decomposing heat-labile APIs.

Standard method
Solvent exchange and concentration by continuous thin-film evaporation
Equipment
Wiped film short path evaporator
Makers
Sulzer
Reagents and materials
Bulk organic solvents

Why it is the standard. Thin-film evaporation renews the liquid film at high speed and removes solvent at low temperature in a short time, so it is suited to continuous solvent exchange and concentration of heat-labile APIs and intermediates. Continuous distillation is an established technology that serves both solvent recovery and purity improvement (a standard unit operation in process chemistry).

About this step and the alternatives

A step that exchanges the solvent used for the reaction for one suited to the next crystallization and adjusts the concentration. In the original solvent, crystals form with difficulty and do not take the intended crystal form.

The solvent is exchanged using equipment that forms a thin film and evaporates quickly, or continuous distillation, while keeping the heating time short. The point is not to heat for long.

Because it is done in a short time, decomposition is limited even for heat-labile compounds. It sets up, continuously within the flow, the solvent stage on which the success of crystallization depends.

The solvent is exchanged for one suited to the next crystallization, and the concentration is adjusted. In the solvent used for the reaction, crystals may not form readily or may not take the desired crystal form. In flow, the solvent is exchanged with equipment that forms a thin film and evaporates quickly, or with continuous distillation, keeping the heating time short. This limits decomposition of heat-labile compounds.

Alternatives in practice

  • Solvent exchange by continuous membrane (organophilic nanofiltration) · Evonik PuraMem / DuraMem series OSN membrane modules — Solvent exchange of heat-labile compounds at low temperature. No evaporation energy is needed, but it depends on the solvent resistance of the membrane
  • Falling-film / short-path distillation · Buss-SMS-Canzler falling-film evaporator / UIC KDL short-path distillation unit — For concentrating high-boiling or thermally unstable products. Short residence time keeps the heat load down

Phase 3Workup and crystallization

09

Isolation by continuous crystallization and control of crystal form and particle size (continuous crystallization)

The most important isolation step, determining purity and physical properties, controlling polymorph and crystal size distribution by holding temperature, residence time and antisolvent ratio constant.

Standard method
MSMPR (mixed suspension, mixed product removal) continuous crystallization cascade
Equipment
Crystallizer, Coriolis liquid mass flow controller
Reagents and materials
Bulk organic solvents

Why it is the standard. MSMPR is the most studied and most adopted configuration for pharmaceutical continuous crystallization, and the polymorph and crystal size distribution (CSD) can be controlled by manipulating residence time, temperature and antisolvent ratio. In a documented example, the desired polymorph of L-glutamic acid was produced continuously through temperature and residence time. Sources: RSC C8CE00042E (review of continuous crystallizers), Engineering journal "Progress of Pharmaceutical Continuous Crystallization", OPRD 7b00225 (techno-economic evaluation of MSMPR configurations)

Check also. Continuous crystallization is the most important step, determining purity and particle properties, but an unintended crystal form (polymorph) can appear, or crystals can adhere to and block vessels and piping and upset steady-state operation. Polymorph and particle size are confirmed separately downstream by X-ray powder diffraction and particle size measurement, and stable long-duration operation is verified on the actual equipment.

About this step and the alternatives

A step that takes the dissolved API out as crystals; it is the most important step in determining purity and physical properties. How well it goes here largely decides later dissolution and stability.

Crystal form (polymorph) and size determine dissolution, stability and ease of tableting. So the aim is not simply to solidify the API but to build the intended crystals.

MSMPR is a method in which vessels are connected in series and temperature and residence time are kept constant. Its strength is that uniform particles are produced every time and batch-to-batch variation can be reduced.

This is the most important step, determining purity and physical properties, in which the dissolved API is taken out as crystals. The crystal form (polymorph) and size govern dissolution, stability and ease of tableting. In continuous crystallization, vessels are connected in series or the solution is flowed through narrow tubes, keeping temperature and residence time constant and producing uniform particles every time. Batch-to-batch variation is reduced.

Alternatives in practice

  • Plug-flow continuous crystallization (PFC) · NiTech DN15/DN6 continuous oscillatory baffled crystallizer (COBC) — Narrow RTD gives a uniform crystal size distribution. Excellent reproducibility of particle size on scale-up
  • Batch cooling / antisolvent crystallization (control) · Mettler Toledo OptiMax 1001 + EasySampling, ParticleTrack E25 (FBRM) — For initial exploration of polymorph and particle size, and as a control. Used to establish conditions before moving to continuous
  • Ultrasound-assisted continuous crystallization (sonocrystallization) · Hielscher UIP1000hdT ultrasonic processor + flow cell — Promotes primary nucleation to obtain fine, uniform crystals. Effective for eliminating seeding and suppressing agglomeration

Phase 4Workup and isolation

10

Continuous filtration, washing and drying (solid-liquid separation and desolvation of wet crystals; solid-liquid separation, drying/isolation)

An isolation step that processes filtration, washing and drying continuously and consistently, determining purity and safety by removing mother-liquor impurities and lowering residual solvent.

Standard method
Continuous filtration, washing and drying (carousel-type / continuous filter dryer)
Equipment
Continuous filter dryer
Makers
Andritz, Glatt
Reagents and materials
Bulk organic solvents

Why it is the standard. Continuous filter dryers / rotary continuous filters make filtration, washing, deliquoring and drying continuous and process wet crystals in one go, so they are the standard isolation unit of a continuous manufacturing line. Mother-liquor washing efficiency and drying determine residual solvent and purity (an established unit operation in process chemistry).

About this step and the alternatives

A solid-liquid separation step that removes the mother liquor from the crystal slurry, washes out the remaining impurities, and dries off the solvent left in the crystals. It finishes the crystals into a "usable solid."

A large amount of residual solvent causes problems for safety and stability. That is why three stages are needed: filtration to remove the liquid, washing to flush out mother-liquor impurities, and drying to drive off the solvent.

In continuous mode, rotary filters or carousel-type units that perform filtration, washing and drying in a single machine are used to take out the crystals within the flow without interruption.

The liquid is removed from the crystal slurry, impurities left in the mother liquor are washed out, and the solvent remaining in the crystals is dried off. A large amount of residual solvent causes problems for safety and stability. In continuous mode, rotary filters or carousels that perform filtration, washing and drying in a single unit are used to take out the crystals continuously within the flow.

Alternatives in practice

  • Solid-liquid separation by continuous centrifugation · Rousselet Robatel continuous peeler centrifuge / Ferrum continuous decanter centrifuge — For deliquoring highly wet cakes and fine-particle slurries. Avoids filter media clogging and gives high throughput
  • Continuous drying (fluidized bed / conductive) · Glatt GPCG fluidized bed dryer (continuous mode) / Buss-SMS-Canzler contact thin-film dryer — A stand-alone drying step after filtration. Conductive drying allows lower temperature and shorter time for heat-labile crystals

Phase 5Quality attributes and analytics

11

Structure confirmation (identification)

A specification test that identifies the target API, establishing atom connectivity by NMR and molecular formula by HRMS to prevent isomer mix-ups.

Standard method
Structure confirmation by multinuclear NMR (1H/13C, 2D) + high-resolution mass spectrometry
Makers
Waters, Anton Paar, Bruker, JEOL
Reagents and materials
API reference standards and impurity standards (CRS)

Why it is the standard. NMR is the reference method for establishing atom connectivity and HRMS for confirming molecular formula, and together they are the standard for structural identification of new APIs and intermediates. ICH Q6A requires an identification test as a specification item. Sources: ICH Q6A (specifications and test procedures), standard approaches to identifying new drug substances

About this step and the alternatives

An identification step that confirms at the molecular level that the substance obtained really is the target API. Mistaking a different compound or an isomer would be fatal, so it is done rigorously.

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) reads the arrangement of hydrogens and carbons and supports the molecular skeleton. It is the work of checking that the molecule has been assembled according to the blueprint.

High-resolution mass spectrometry then pins down the molecular weight as well. By establishing the structure from both skeleton and mass, no doubt is left about its validity.

This confirms at the molecular level that the substance obtained really is the target API. Mistaking a different compound or an isomer would be fatal. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) reads the arrangement of hydrogens and carbons and supports the molecular skeleton. Together with mass spectrometry, the molecular weight is also confirmed and the structure is established.

Alternatives in practice

  • Single-crystal X-ray structure analysis (determination of absolute configuration) · Rigaku XtaLAB Synergy / Bruker D8 VENTURE (PHOTON III detector, Cu/Mo sources) — Determines configuration and crystal structure unambiguously. Requires a good-quality single crystal
  • Functional group confirmation and identification by FTIR/Raman · Thermo Nicolet iS50 FTIR (ATR) / Bruker MultiRAM Raman — Functional group identification and comparison with the reference standard. Rapid, as a complement to NMR/MS
  • Optical rotation / specific rotation measurement · Anton Paar MCP 5300 / Rudolph Autopol VI polarimeter — Simple confirmation of identity and purity of optically active compounds. A qualitative indicator of chirality
12

Quantitation of content (assay) and related substances (organic impurities) (assay and related substances test)

A step that quantifies content, which governs efficacy, and related substances, which bear directly on safety, by reversed-phase HPLC-UV and confirms that none exceeds the specification.

Standard method
Assay and related substances test by reversed-phase HPLC (UV detection)
Reagents and materials
RP-HPLC column, HPLC mobile phase solvents, API reference standards and impurity standards (CRS)

Why it is the standard. Reversed-phase HPLC-UV is the reference method for quantitating drug substance content and related substances, and is used for control against the thresholds of ICH Q3A (impurities in new drug substances) (reporting 0.05% / identification 0.10% / qualification 0.15% as guides). Sources: ICH Q3A(R2), ICH Q2 (analytical method validation)

Check also. UV detection in reversed-phase HPLC can miss impurities that absorb little UV, and for unknown impurities the response factor (sensitivity) differs from that of the target compound, so the area ratio does not translate directly into a weight ratio. Important impurities are quantitated against reference standards and, as needed, complemented with another detector (CAD or MS).

With Biocatalytic flow (immobilized enzyme, packed bed)

  • The enzyme builds the stereochemistry as a single enantiomer, so a racemate resolution step is not needed
  • Method: Chiral HPLC is run not for resolution but to confirm the ee of the enzymatic reaction (often >99%) as a specification test
  • Check also: The ee upgrading step by chemical asymmetric catalysis or crystallization can be omitted, but the ee confirmation test itself remains mandatory
About this step and the alternatives

A step that measures how much of the target API the product contains (content) and how much impurity such as by-products it contains (related substances).

Content bears directly on efficacy and impurities on safety. Covering both in a single test determines whether the product conforms to the specification.

The basic approach is to separate the components one by one by reversed-phase HPLC and measure the amounts by UV detection. It confirms that no impurity exceeds the specification and supports the release decision.

This measures how much of the target API the product contains (content) and how much impurity such as by-products it contains (related substances). Content bears directly on efficacy and impurities on safety. The basic approach is to separate the components by reversed-phase HPLC and measure the amounts by UV detection, confirming that no impurity exceeds the specification.

Alternatives in practice

  • Identification and quantitation of trace impurities by LC-MS/MS · Sciex Triple Quad 7500 / Agilent 6470 LC-TQ / Waters Xevo TQ-XS — Structural assignment and high-sensitivity quantitation of trace related substances not adequately separated by UV
  • Charged aerosol detection (CAD) / ELSD · Thermo Vanquish Charged Aerosol Detector / Agilent 1290 Infinity II ELSD — General-purpose quantitation of compounds without chromophores, counterions and excipients
  • Optical purity by chiral HPLC/SFC · Waters ACQUITY UPC2 (SFC) + Daicel CHIRALPAK IG/IC columns — Confirmation of enantiomeric excess (linked to step 12). For optical isomers that cannot be separated by reversed phase
13

Confirmation of optical purity and enantiomeric excess: unwanted enantiomers are separated and quantitated by chiral stationary phase HPLC, and enantiomeric purity (ee) is controlled within the specification (chiral separation, optical purity test)

Essential in release testing to control the unwanted enantiomer of a chiral API within the specification

Standard method
Enantiomer separation and quantitation by reversed-phase / normal-phase chiral HPLC with a polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase
Reagents and materials
Polysaccharide chiral column, HPLC mobile phase solvents

Why it is the standard. Immobilized polysaccharide-based chiral columns have wide solvent compatibility and can be applied to a broad range of chiral APIs, making this the industry-standard method for ee measurement.

Check also. Chiral HPLC assures enantiomeric purity only when it reliably separates not just the target enantiomer but all related isomers. Insufficient separation leads to overestimation, so the suitability of column selection and separation conditions is verified, and the method is built into release testing in line with regulations (ICH Q6A, etc.).

About this step and the alternatives

A step indispensable for chiral drug substances. It controls how little of the unwanted side is mixed in among molecules (enantiomers) that are mirror images of each other, like a right hand and a left hand.

Enantiomers can have completely opposite efficacy or safety, so ICH Q6A and the FDA chiral policy require that a purity specification be set.

Both enantiomers are separated and quantitated by HPLC with a polysaccharide-based chiral column, and the ee (enantiomeric excess) is kept within the specification in release testing. It is the guardian of optical purity.

For chiral drug substances, ICH Q6A and the FDA chiral policy require that a specification for enantiomeric purity be set and controlled. The standard step is to separate and quantitate the unwanted enantiomer by chiral-column HPLC and confirm the ee (enantiomeric excess) in release testing.

Alternatives in practice

  • Chiral SFC (supercritical fluid chromatography) · Waters ACQUITY UPC2 / Agilent 1260 Infinity II SFC + Daicel CHIRALPAK IG-3/IC-3 — CO2-based, fast, high resolution and low solvent use. Easy to extend to preparative scale
  • Separation and quantitation of volatile enantiomers by chiral GC · Agilent 8890 GC + Agilent CP-Chirasil-Dex CB (cyclodextrin) column — For enantiomers that are volatile or can be derivatized. Effective for small molecules that are difficult to separate by HPLC
14

Trace control of mutagenic (genotoxic) impurities and nitrosamines (mutagenic impurity and nitrosamine control)

The regulatory top-priority step, controlling mutagenic impurities and nitrosamines at or below the TTC (1.5 µg/day) by ppb-level mass spectrometry.

Standard method
Trace quantitation of mutagenic impurities by LC-MS/MS or GC-MS/MS
Equipment
LC-MS (liquid chromatography mass spectrometry), Residual solvent GC headspace
Makers
Agilent
Reagents and materials
API reference standards and impurity standards (CRS)

Why it is the standard. Under ICH M7, mutagenic impurities must be controlled at or below the TTC (threshold of toxicological concern, generally 1.5 µg/day), and nitrosamines (NDMA/NDEA/NDSRI, etc.) are typically detected at trace levels by LC-MS/MS or GC-MS. Since the 2018 valsartan NDMA problem, they have been a top regulatory priority. Sources: ICH M7(R2), LCGC "Low-Level Determination of Nitrosamine Impurities by LC-MS/MS", PMC12655250

Check also. For mutagenic impurities, the premise is to assess for each compound the risk of formation and carryover from the synthetic route, and to set the specification first on the basis of an acceptable intake (TTC, etc.). A dedicated high-sensitivity analytical method must be built for each target substance, and a general-purpose simultaneous analysis cannot cover everything.

About this step and the alternatives

A step that controls impurities that can damage genes and may cause cancer even in very small amounts down to extremely low levels.

Since the NDMA contamination problem with the antihypertensive valsartan, nitrosamines in particular have come under strict scrutiny. Caution is required in flow synthesis that uses hazardous reagents.

Mutagenic impurities formed as by-products are reliably detected by high-sensitivity mass spectrometry at the ppb (parts per billion) level. What counts is the sensitivity to catch amounts too small to see.

Impurities that can damage genes and may cause cancer even in very small amounts are controlled down to extremely low levels. Since the NDMA contamination problem with valsartan, nitrosamines in particular have come under strict scrutiny. Flow synthesis often involves reactions that use hazardous reagents, so mutagenic impurities formed as by-products are reliably detected by ppb-level high-sensitivity mass spectrometry.

Alternatives in practice

  • Volatile mutagens (alkyl halides, etc.) by headspace GC-MS · Agilent 8890 GC + 7697A headspace sampler + 5977B MSD — High-sensitivity screening of volatile alkylating agents. Avoids matrix interference
  • Screening by high-resolution MS (Orbitrap) · Thermo Orbitrap Exploris 240 (full-scan high resolution) — Comprehensive search for unknown mutagens and estimation of molecular formula. Target-independent detection
  • Mutagenicity prediction by (in silico) structure-activity relationship · Lhasa Derek Nexus / Instem Leadscope (ICH M7 (Q)SAR) — Prioritization and classification before measurement. For narrowing down the impurities to be tested
15

Quantitation of residual solvents (ICH Q3C / USP <467>) (residual solvents test)

A step that quantitates residual solvents by HS-GC-FID against class-specific permitted limits, supporting toxicity control and the adequacy of the drying step.

Standard method
Residual solvents test by headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC-FID)
Equipment
Residual solvent GC headspace
Reagents and materials
API reference standards and impurity standards (CRS)

Why it is the standard. HS-GC-FID is the recommended reference method for residual solvent analysis of drug substances, and ICH Q3C and USP <467> specify permitted limits for Class 1–3 solvents. Identification at confirmation is by GC-MS. Sources: ICH Q3C(R8), USP <467>, Chromatography Online "Generic Method Approach for Residual Solvents by GC"

About this step and the alternatives

A step that measures the amount of organic solvent left in the crystals and confirms that it is within a safe range. Some solvents are toxic or carcinogenic and cannot be overlooked.

Upper limits are set by class in ICH Q3C and elsewhere, and it must be shown that they are not exceeded. It also serves as a check on whether drying was sufficient.

Headspace GC, which heats the solid and takes in the components that vaporize, separates and quantitates the volatile solvents in one run. It also supports the adequacy of the drying step.

This measures the amount of organic solvent left in the crystals and confirms that it is within a safe range. Some solvents are toxic or carcinogenic, and upper limits are set by class. Headspace GC, which heats the solid and takes in the components that vaporize, separates and quantitates the volatile solvents in one run. It also supports the adequacy of the drying step.

Alternatives in practice

  • Identification confirmation by headspace GC-MS · Agilent 8890 GC + 7697A HS + 5977B MSD / Shimadzu HS-20 + GCMS-QP2020 NX — Identification of unknown peaks and co-eluting solvents. Verifies misassignments by FID
  • Direct-injection GC (nonvolatile / high-boiling solvents) · Agilent 8890 GC (split/splitless injection) + FID — Quantitation of high-boiling solvents that partition poorly into the headspace (DMSO, NMP, etc.)
  • Residual solvent screening by 1H-NMR · Bruker AVANCE NEO 400 MHz / Magritek Spinsolve 80 — Simple, with little sample preparation. Semi-quantitates multiple solvents at once. Inferior to GC-HS in the trace range
16

Identification of solid form (polymorphs, crystallinity) (polymorph and solid form identification)

A step that fingerprints polymorphs, salts and hydrates by XRPD and confirms the intended crystal form that governs solubility and stability.

Standard method
Identification of polymorph and crystallinity by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)
Equipment
XRPD polymorph
Reagents and materials
None (angle and intensity calibration with standard silicon NIST SRM 640 / corundum SRM 676 as needed).

Why it is the standard. XRPD can determine the solid form of crystalline and amorphous APIs in a fingerprint-like manner with a single technique, and is the reference method for identifying polymorphs, salts and hydrates. ICH Q6A requires polymorphism as a physical property specification. Sources: ICH Q6A (polymorphism decision trees), Malvern Panalytical "Use XRPD to select stable solid forms"

Check also. X-ray powder diffraction can determine whether the intended polymorph has been produced, but when crystals align in one direction (orientation) the intensity ratios change, and very small amounts of amorphous material or another polymorph can be missed. Where it affects critical quality, sample preparation is standardized, and the result is reinforced with other solid-state analyses (DSC or Raman) as needed.

About this step and the alternatives

A step that confirms which crystal form (polymorph) the API is in. Even for the same molecule, a different arrangement of the crystal changes its properties as if it were a different substance.

A different arrangement changes solubility and stability, affecting efficacy and shelf life. That is why checking that the intended form has been produced is indispensable.

X-ray powder diffraction returns a "fingerprint" pattern unique to each crystal. It can tell at a glance whether the intended polymorph has been produced and whether another form is mixed in.

This confirms which crystal form (polymorph) the API is in. Even for the same molecule, a different arrangement of the crystal changes solubility and stability, which affects efficacy and shelf life. X-ray powder diffraction gives a fingerprint-like pattern of the crystal and determines whether the intended polymorph has been produced and whether another form is mixed in.

Alternatives in practice

  • Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) / thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) · TA Instruments Discovery DSC 2500 / TGA 5500, Mettler Toledo DSC 3+ — Thermal behavior of melting point, polymorphic transition and desolvation. Used together with XRPD to distinguish hydrates/solvates
  • Dynamic vapor sorption (DVS) · Surface Measurement Systems DVS Intrinsic / TA Instruments Q5000 SA — Evaluation of hygroscopicity, hydrate formation and deliquescence. Humidity-dependent stability of polymorphs
  • Solid form confirmation by Raman / solid-state NMR (ssNMR) · Bruker MultiRAM Raman / Bruker AVANCE NEO 400 ssNMR (CP/MAS) — Evaluation of the local environment of the crystal structure and amorphous content. Complements the XRPD amorphous halo
17

Evaluation of particle size distribution (PSD) and particle morphology (particle size distribution, PSD evaluation)

A step that measures particle size distribution by laser diffraction and confirms reproducibility of the crystallization particle size, which governs solubility, flowability and content uniformity.

Standard method
Particle size distribution measurement by laser diffraction
Equipment
Laser diffraction: Malvern Panalytical Mastersizer 3000 (dry Aero S / wet Hydro MV/EV/SV), Microtrac SYNC, Beckman Coulter LS 13 320.
Makers
Malvern Panalytical, Beckman Coulter
Reagents and materials
Surfactants

Why it is the standard. Laser diffraction is the routine reference method for API particle size distribution, controlling through Dv10/Dv50/Dv90 the particle size that affects solubility, flowability and content uniformity. ICH Q6A calls for particle size as a specification item where applicable. Sources: ICH Q6A, ISO 13320 (laser diffraction methods), Malvern Mastersizer 3000

With Biocatalytic flow (immobilized enzyme, packed bed)

  • Because no metal catalyst is used, the profile of catalyst-derived elemental impurities such as Pd/Rh under ICH Q3D changes fundamentally
  • Method: The main target of ICP-MS testing shifts from catalyst metals (Pd/Rh/Fe, etc.) to confirming a nearly metal-free route and checking trace elements derived from the enzyme/buffer
  • Check also: A Q3D assessment is still required, but the high-risk catalyst metals drop out and the specifications and control strategy are simplified
About this step and the alternatives

A step that measures the spread in size and the shape of the crystal particles. How fine the particles are affects both drug performance and ease of manufacture.

Particle size governs solubility (absorption) and also determines how easily the material flows and mixes in later formulation steps. Particles that are too small or too large are both hard to handle.

Laser diffraction measures the size distribution of the particles in one run and confirms that crystallization reproduces the intended particle size. It is an indicator that supports the stability of continuous crystallization.

This measures the spread in size and the shape of the crystal particles. Particle size governs solubility (absorption) and how easily the material flows and mixes in the later formulation steps. Laser diffraction measures the size distribution of the particles in one run and confirms that crystallization reproduces the intended particle size. It is an important indicator that supports the stability of continuous crystallization.

Alternatives in practice

  • Particle size and shape by image analysis (dynamic/static) · Malvern Panalytical Morphologi 4 / Sympatec QICPIC (dynamic image analysis) — Also provides individual particle shape and aspect ratio. Strong for distinguishing needles and agglomerates
  • In-line FBRM (chord length distribution) · Mettler Toledo ParticleTrack G400 (FBRM) — Real-time in-process monitoring. Tracks the trend of particle size change during crystallization
  • Sieving (coarse particles) · Retsch AS 200 vibratory sieve shaker + test sieves (JIS/ASTM standard sieves) — Simple particle size check for coarse particles and agglomerates. Low cost but not applicable to fines
18

Control of inorganic impurities (elemental impurities, residual metal catalysts) (elemental impurity analysis)

A control step that uses ICP-MS to quantitate residual catalyst such as Pd and other elemental impurities simultaneously and with high sensitivity, confirming they are below the PDE-based limits.

Standard method
Elemental impurity analysis by ICP-MS (ICH Q3D)
Equipment
ICP-MS and ICP-OES
Reagents and materials
API reference standards and impurity standards (CRS)

Why it is the standard. ICP-MS is the reference method that can quantitate residual catalysts such as Pd and other elemental impurities simultaneously and with high sensitivity, and ICH Q3D specifies element limits based on the PDE (permitted daily exposure). USP <232>/<233> specify the procedures. Sources: ICH Q3D(R2), USP <232>/<233>

Check also. Elemental impurities are controlled under ICH Q3D after narrowing the targets by risk assessment to the catalyst metals used and metals derived from the equipment. If the sample is not dissolved completely, the values come out low, so the validity of the measurement is confirmed through digestion conditions and spike recovery.

About this step and the alternatives

A step that measures whether metal catalysts such as the palladium used in the reaction, or heavy metals that dissolved out of the equipment, remain in the product. They are toxic even in trace amounts and are therefore controlled.

It is especially important in flow synthesis, which makes heavy use of metal catalysts. It shows that the product is within the specification, against ICH Q3D, which sets upper limits for elemental impurities.

The sample is dissolved in acid and atomized in a plasma, and ICP-MS (mass spectrometry) quantitates each element in one run with high sensitivity. It is also the final confirmation of the effect of scavenger removal.

This measures whether metal catalysts such as the palladium used in the reaction, or heavy metals derived from the equipment, remain in the product. They are toxic even in trace amounts, and upper limits are set. It is especially important because flow synthesis makes heavy use of metal catalysts. The sample is dissolved in acid and atomized in a plasma, and mass spectrometry quantitates each element in one run with high sensitivity.

Alternatives in practice

  • Elemental analysis by ICP-OES (optical emission spectrometry) · Agilent 5800/5900 ICP-OES / PerkinElmer Avio 560 — For relatively high-concentration elements and high-matrix samples. More robust and less prone to interference than ICP-MS
  • Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) · Agilent 240/280 FS AA / PerkinElmer PinAAcle 900 (flame / graphite furnace) — Targeted quantitation of a single element or specific metal (residual catalyst Pd, etc.). Low cost
  • On-line/in-line control of residual catalyst + scavenging verification · Confirmation by step 6 SiliCycle SiliaMetS scavenger + outlet ICP-MS (Agilent 7900) — Assures metal removal performance within the process. Preventive control that lowers the burden on final ICP-MS
19

Confirmation of water content, loss on drying and content uniformity (water content / loss on drying test)

A step that selectively quantitates water with high precision by KF titration, supporting stability, hydrate determination, content calculation and the sufficiency of drying.

Standard method
Water determination by Karl Fischer (KF) titration
Equipment
Karl Fischer titration
Reagents and materials
API reference standards and impurity standards (CRS)

Why it is the standard. KF titration is the reference method that reacts selectively with water and quantitates trace water with high precision, and is used for the water content specification of drug substances and for hydrate confirmation. USP <921> and ICH Q6A specify water content as a specification item. The coulometric method is used for trace levels. Sources: USP <921>, ICH Q6A, Ph. Eur. 2.5.12

About this step and the alternatives

A step that measures how much water the product contains. Water affects stability, the judgment of whether the material is a hydrate, and the basis of the content calculation, so it is pinned down accurately.

The Karl Fischer method uses a reagent that reacts only with water and quantitates water selectively and with high sensitivity. Its strength is that it can single out and measure only the water.

From this result it is confirmed whether the drying step was sufficient and whether the product is within the specification. It is one of the checks that close out the quality of the final solid.

This measures how much water the product contains. Water affects stability, the judgment of whether the material is a hydrate, and the content calculation. The Karl Fischer method uses a reagent that reacts only with water and quantitates water selectively and with high sensitivity. It supports that the drying step was sufficient and that the result is within the specification.

Alternatives in practice

  • Loss on drying (LOD) · Mettler Toledo HE73/HC103 halogen moisture analyzer / constant-temperature dryer + analytical balance (Mettler Toledo XPR) — Simple evaluation of total volatiles. Does not distinguish water from other volatiles but is routine in GMP
  • Thermogravimetric evaluation of water and volatiles by TGA · TA Instruments Discovery TGA 5500 / Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC 3+ — Distinguishes hydrate water / adsorbed water / solvent from the dehydration temperature range. Used with XRPD/DSC to determine the form

The reference (“gold standard”) method is the one broadly recognized in published practice and guidelines; your process, product and regulator may justify another. Makers and products are examples, not endorsements. This map is translated from the Japanese edition, where it is updated first (Japanese version).